Pedagogocal design: quality and evaluation

Peer review is a well established practice. It has a reciprocal effect on the reviewer and the reviewee – they obviously both learn.We take advntage of this powerful method, but we aslo apply other measures to make sure the product is state-of-the-art.

Our course is extensively reviewed – by the partenrs, by critical friends, by the participants. We planned the development cycle, the piloting and evaluation as well as the refinement as important parts of quality assurance. So what stands behind this e-course?

1) ongoing peer review during the design phase: to check the aligment of objectives, activities and results as well as feasibility of the technological solutions;

2) piloting: to gather feedback from 400 course participants and 10 facilitators

3) external evaluation: to learn from experts and confront it with the piloting findings

4) Learning Design: to check the modules against the LD-tools and gather feedback from LD Challange participants

5) fine tuning: discussing changes, making amendments and localising the final versions

In the end we hope to release the weel designed final version, open to re-mix and re-use by you.

Comments are closed.